Is it prostitution to take money from someone who is expecting sex, but then not supply it?

A person who doesn't supply sex and takes money is not a prostitute, this is called an escort. An escort is someone paid to go on a date as a companion. A prostitute is someone who sells their body, exchanges sex for money.

Is it sociably respectable?

• Could be because the person is not exactly selling their body.
  
• Or could be less socially respectable because their taking money without supplying the sex and portraying themselves as a prostitute.
  

Is this Being Bad?

My opinion... for someone to pay an prostitute money without receiving sex is allowing that person to take them for a fool. It's not theft if the person hasn't said they would be supplying sex at the end of the night exchange for the money.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution

The Trip

I was a young carefree teenager when I thought that I could do whatever I wanted and not suffer the consequences. As an adult only now I can look back and see how wrong I was.......here i had a close shave.

I was dating a guy (young love) and I can honestly say I was easily mislead. He suggested a trip to London which would mean 'wagging' school. I coerced my friend into coming along also so that I would have a partner in crime. We lied to our parents as to why we would be coming home late and packed a bag with a change of clothes.

Full of excitement and enthusiasm we waitined patiently for our 'trip' to start.

We waited....

........and waited

....still waited.

I took initative and sneaked back home to call the boyfriend, spoke to him , to be left truly disappointed. We was not going to London after all....he said that he couldn't make it.

Now Im sure that was a blessing because i cannot fathom the trouble I would have got into if we had ended up in London on that day.